Pangaea Logistics Solutions vs Tsakos Energy Navigation
PANL and TEN side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How PANL and TEN compare
Pangaea Logistics Solutions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.8% versus −0.67% for Tsakos Energy Navigation).
Tsakos Energy Navigation keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.1% compared with 9.7% at Pangaea Logistics Solutions.
Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays a dividend yielding 2.7%; Tsakos Energy Navigation does not pay one.
Pangaea Logistics Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 4 for Tsakos Energy Navigation), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | PANL | TEN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $608M | – |
| Share price | $9.28 | $47.33 |
| Change, 1 year | 43.9% | 87.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 137% | 507% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.81 | 0.69 |
| Employees | – | 178 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 8.1× | – |
| P/S | 0.8× | – |
| P/B | 1.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.2× | – |
| Fair value | $12.02 | – |
| Margin of safety | 22.8% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 27.8% (better) | −0.67% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.5% (better) | 4.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 363% (better) | −8.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 283% (better) | −11.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 2.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 12.2% | 31.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 9.7% | 20.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 16.3% (better) | 8.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.8% (better) | 6.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.48 (better) | 0.98 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.59 (better) | 3.56 |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.7× |
| Current ratio | 1.52 (better) | 1.40 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.29 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.7% | – |
| Payout ratio | 22.7% | 37.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 17.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.7% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 42.8% | – |
| Held by insiders | 49.0% | 28.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.1M | −$103K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.2% | 2.7% |
Go deeper
- PANL stock overview
- PANL income statement
- PANL valuation and score
- TEN stock overview
- TEN income statement
- TEN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.