Openlane vs Rush Enterprises
OPLN and RUSHA side by side, both in retail-auto dealers & gasoline stations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How OPLN and RUSHA compare
Openlane grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.8% versus −2.6% for Rush Enterprises).
Openlane keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.2% compared with 3.7% at Rush Enterprises.
Openlane scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 8 for Rush Enterprises), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | OPLN | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.3B | – |
| Share price | $35.04 | $45.04 |
| Change, 1 year | 40.7% | 35.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 137% | 81.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.05 | 0.79 |
| Employees | 4,800 | 7,355 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 2.0× | – |
| P/B | 2.7× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.3× | – |
| P/FCF | 11.3× | – |
| FCF yield | 8.8% | – |
| Fair value | $22.92 | – |
| Margin of safety | −52.9% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.8% (better) | −2.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.8% | 9.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 15.8% (better) | 0.87% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 19.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 45.6% (better) | 19.3% |
| Operating margin | 11.9% (better) | 5.1% |
| Net margin | 9.2% (better) | 3.7% |
| FCF margin | 17.8% (better) | 0.80% |
| Return on equity | 13.1% (better) | 12.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 14.4% (better) | 12.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.34 | 0.11 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.84 | 0.08 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 6.4× | 12.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.16 | 1.44 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.58 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 22.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 4 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 22.0% |
| Buyback yield | 2.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.4% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 87.7% | 138% |
| Held by insiders | 7.7% | 13.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$287M | −$12.0M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.5% | – |
Go deeper
- OPLN stock overview
- OPLN income statement
- OPLN valuation and score
- RUSHA stock overview
- RUSHA income statement
- RUSHA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.