ON Semiconductor vs STMicroelectronics
ON and STM side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ON and STM compare
ON Semiconductor grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.9% versus −11.1% for STMicroelectronics).
ON Semiconductor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.8% compared with 1.4% at STMicroelectronics.
ON Semiconductor scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 4 for STMicroelectronics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ON | STM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $27.7B | – |
| Share price | $71.06 | $46.73 |
| Change, 1 year | 44.2% | 94.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 12.2% | −9.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.62 | 1.54 |
| Employees | 26K | 49K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 41.3× | – |
| P/S | 4.3× | – |
| P/B | 3.7× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.8× | – |
| P/FCF | 17.1× | – |
| FCF yield | 5.8% | – |
| Fair value | $53.28 | – |
| Margin of safety | −33.4% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.9% (better) | −11.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.7% | 2.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 116% (better) | −89.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 123% (better) | −89.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −12.3% (better) | −31.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 38.7% (better) | 33.9% |
| Operating margin | 12.3% (better) | 1.5% |
| Net margin | 10.8% (better) | 1.4% |
| FCF margin | 25.4% | – |
| Return on equity | 8.9% (better) | 0.94% |
| Return on invested capital | 7.7% (better) | 0.55% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.59 | 0.12 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.06 (better) | −0.83 |
| Interest coverage | 13.6× (better) | 3.2× |
| Current ratio | 3.55 (better) | 3.36 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.62 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 193% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 4.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.2% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 19.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.52% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$21.3M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.4% | – |
Go deeper
- ON stock overview
- ON income statement
- ON valuation and score
- STM stock overview
- STM income statement
- STM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.