StockData

Natera vs RadNet

NTRA and RDNT side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How NTRA and RDNT compare

Natera is the larger company, worth 7.6 times as much as RadNet ($46.0B against $6.0B).

Natera grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (37.4% versus 21.1% for RadNet).

RadNet keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −0.94% compared with −5.7% at Natera.

Natera scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for RadNet), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricNTRARDNT
Size and price
Market cap$46.0B$6.0B
Share price$319.09$76.42
Change, 1 year52.3%2.6%
Change, 5 years209%170%
Beta (5Y)1.381.15
Employees6,14076
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)7
Valuation score00
Growth score3 (better)2
Performance score22
Health score5 (better)3
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S15.8×2.5× (better)
P/B24.6×5.4× (better)
EV/EBITDA–27.4×
P/FCF877×–
FCF yield0.11%–
Fair value$126.82$48.94
Margin of safety−152%−56.1% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)37.4% (better)21.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average42.6% (better)13.7%
Profitability
Operating margin−9.0%3.1% (better)
Net margin−5.7%−0.94% (better)
FCF margin1.8%–
Return on equity−10.6%−2.1% (better)
Return on invested capital−36.0%2.8% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.04 (better)1.18
Net debt / EBITDA–2.28
Interest coverage−70.8×1.0× (better)
Current ratio2.81 (better)1.49
Altman Z-score31.11 (better)1.94
Piotroski F-score5 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions95.2%104%
Held by insiders3.9%4.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$341M−$11.9M (better)
Superinvestors holding3–
Short interest, % of float4.4%11.8%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.