National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance vs Regional Management
NRUC and RM side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NRUC and RM compare
National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.6% versus 8.4% for Regional Management).
National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 71.5% compared with 7.0% at Regional Management.
Both pay dividends: National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance yields 5.4% and Regional Management 3.4%.
Regional Management scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 6 for National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NRUC | RM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $319M |
| Share price | $19.10 | $35.67 |
| Change, 1 year | −18.8% | −9.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −29.9% | −41.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.29 | 1.06 |
| Employees | 320 | 2,112 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 7.2× |
| P/S | – | 0.5× |
| P/B | – | 0.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 3.9× |
| P/FCF | – | 1.0× |
| FCF yield | – | 100% |
| Fair value | – | $50.06 |
| Margin of safety | – | 28.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 19.6% (better) | 8.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −15.2% | 11.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 27.2% (better) | 14.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 19.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 13.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 71.5% (better) | 7.0% |
| FCF margin | 65.2% (better) | 46.7% |
| Return on equity | 12.3% | 12.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.42 (better) | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 0.69 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.4% (better) | 3.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 43.1% |
| Buyback yield | – | 9.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.4% | 12.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 91.5% |
| Held by insiders | – | 17.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$12.4M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- NRUC stock overview
- NRUC income statement
- NRUC valuation and score
- RM stock overview
- RM income statement
- RM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.