Noah vs Victory Capital
NOAH and VCTR side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NOAH and VCTR compare
Victory Capital grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (36.9% versus 0.36% for Noah).
Victory Capital keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 28.6% compared with 21.4% at Noah.
Victory Capital pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Noah does not pay one.
Victory Capital scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 7 for Noah), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NOAH | VCTR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $7.7B |
| Share price | $6.74 | $125.74 |
| Change, 1 year | −40.4% | 105% |
| Change, 5 years | −85.1% | 272% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 1.09 |
| Employees | 1,778 | 699 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 23.0× |
| P/S | – | 4.9× |
| P/B | – | 3.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 10.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 12.5× |
| PEG | – | 9.98 |
| FCF yield | – | 8.0% |
| Fair value | – | $98.67 |
| Margin of safety | – | −27.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.36% | 36.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −4.6% | 11.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 17.5% | 54.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 17.8% | 39.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 7.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 29.8% | 40.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 21.4% | 28.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 32.3% | 39.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 5.7% | 18.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 10.5% | 21.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 11.4× |
| Current ratio | 4.46 | – |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.87 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.6% |
| Payout ratio | 97.8% | 36.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 6 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 53.2% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.5% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 5.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 7.4% | 79.4% |
| Held by insiders | 32.0% | 96.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$126K | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 135% |
Go deeper
- NOAH stock overview
- NOAH income statement
- NOAH valuation and score
- VCTR stock overview
- VCTR income statement
- VCTR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.