Affiliated Managers vs Victory Capital
AMG and VCTR side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMG and VCTR compare
Affiliated Managers is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Victory Capital ($10.4B against $7.7B).
On earnings, Affiliated Managers is cheaper: it trades at 14.4× trailing earnings, against 23.0× for Victory Capital.
Victory Capital grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (36.9% versus 14.5% for Affiliated Managers).
Affiliated Managers keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 35.0% compared with 28.6% at Victory Capital.
Both pay dividends: Affiliated Managers yields 0.01% and Victory Capital 1.6%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMG | VCTR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.4B | $7.7B |
| Share price | $401.93 | $125.74 |
| Change, 1 year | 54.8% | 105% |
| Change, 5 years | 131% | 272% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.14 | 1.09 |
| Employees | 5,600 | 699 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 14 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.4× (better) | 23.0× |
| P/S | 4.4× (better) | 4.9× |
| P/B | 3.7× | 3.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 10.4× |
| P/FCF | 9.0× (better) | 12.5× |
| PEG | – | 9.98 |
| FCF yield | 11.1% (better) | 8.0% |
| Fair value | $416.42 | $98.67 |
| Margin of safety | 3.5% (better) | −27.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.5% | 36.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.46% | 11.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 53.8% | 54.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 74.2% (better) | 39.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 39.3% (better) | 7.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 40.4% |
| Net margin | 35.0% (better) | 28.6% |
| FCF margin | 49.2% (better) | 39.0% |
| Return on equity | 26.6% (better) | 18.9% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 21.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 11.4× |
| Altman Z-score | 2.53 | 3.87 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.01% | 1.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 36.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −35.2% | 53.2% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 10.8% (better) | 3.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 10.8% (better) | 5.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.6% | 79.4% |
| Held by insiders | 3.7% | 96.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$9.5M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 135% |
Go deeper
- AMG stock overview
- AMG income statement
- AMG valuation and score
- VCTR stock overview
- VCTR income statement
- VCTR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.