Newmark vs Marriott Vacations Worldwide
NMRK and VAC side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How NMRK and VAC compare
Marriott Vacations Worldwide is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Newmark ($4.0B against $2.0B).
Newmark grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.5% versus 4.6% for Marriott Vacations Worldwide).
Newmark keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.1% compared with −4.7% at Marriott Vacations Worldwide.
Both pay dividends: Newmark yields 1.6% and Marriott Vacations Worldwide 2.7%.
Newmark scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 6 for Marriott Vacations Worldwide), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | NMRK | VAC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.0B | $4.0B |
| Share price | $11.27 | $117.51 |
| Change, 1 year | −33.8% | 134% |
| Change, 5 years | −33.1% | −29.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.30 | 1.32 |
| Employees | 8,800 | 3,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.4× | – |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | 1.4× (better) | 1.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.5× | – |
| P/FCF | 5.3× (better) | 24.6× |
| PEG | 1.05 | – |
| FCF yield | 18.9% (better) | 4.1% |
| Fair value | $17.94 | $93.05 |
| Margin of safety | 37.2% (better) | −26.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.5% (better) | 4.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.6% | 11.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 18.1% (better) | −245% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 25.9% (better) | −276% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 7.4% | – |
| Net margin | 4.1% (better) | −4.7% |
| FCF margin | 10.4% (better) | 3.1% |
| Return on equity | 10.7% (better) | −10.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 10.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.60 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.38 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.09 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.49 (better) | 0.96 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.6% | 2.7% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 42.5% |
| Buyback yield | 10.4% (better) | 0.62% |
| Shareholder yield | 12.0% (better) | 3.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 64.6% | 92.3% |
| Held by insiders | 48.8% | 25.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$82.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.4% | 7.4% |
Go deeper
- NMRK stock overview
- NMRK income statement
- NMRK valuation and score
- VAC stock overview
- VAC income statement
- VAC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.