MaxLinear vs Rambus
MXL and RMBS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MXL and RMBS compare
Rambus is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as MaxLinear ($9.1B against $5.5B).
MaxLinear grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (56.0% versus 17.3% for Rambus).
Rambus keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 33.4% compared with −4.4% at MaxLinear.
Rambus scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 7 for MaxLinear), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MXL | RMBS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.5B | $9.1B |
| Share price | $59.95 | $85.36 |
| Change, 1 year | 296% | −22.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −15.2% | 213% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.09 | 1.75 |
| Employees | 1,115 | 791 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 35.1× |
| P/S | 8.3× (better) | 11.5× |
| P/B | 10.2× | 6.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 148× | 27.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 29.2× |
| FCF yield | −0.38% | 3.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $9.04 | $85.65 |
| Margin of safety | −563% | 0.34% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 56.0% (better) | 17.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.46% | 23.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 16.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 15.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 58.0% | 79.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | −0.92% | 36.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −4.4% | 33.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | −3.1% | 39.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | −5.9% | 19.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −0.88% | 38.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.31 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.22 | – |
| Interest coverage | −0.6× | 245× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.22 | 9.38 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 8.73 | 41.14 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −0.10% | 1.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −0.10% | 1.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 82.0% | 94.0% |
| Held by insiders | 2.3% | 0.78% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$60.1M | −$20.0M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.2% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- MXL stock overview
- MXL income statement
- MXL valuation and score
- RMBS stock overview
- RMBS income statement
- RMBS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.