Murphy Oil vs Range Resources
MUR and RRC side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MUR and RRC compare
Range Resources is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as Murphy Oil ($12.1B against $5.3B).
On earnings, Murphy Oil is cheaper: it trades at 11.5× trailing earnings, against 13.7× for Range Resources.
Range Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.8% versus 13.2% for Murphy Oil).
Range Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.2% compared with 15.0% at Murphy Oil.
Both pay dividends: Murphy Oil yields 3.7% and Range Resources 0.75%.
Murphy Oil scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 11 for Range Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MUR | RRC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.3B | $12.1B |
| Share price | $36.82 | $51.83 |
| Change, 1 year | 27.6% | 34.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 39.8% | 151% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 0.76 |
| Employees | 822 | 564 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.5× (better) | 13.7× |
| P/S | 1.7× (better) | 3.4× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 2.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.6× | – |
| Fair value | $55.18 | $46.39 |
| Margin of safety | 33.3% (better) | −11.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.2% | 20.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.7% | 9.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 228% (better) | 55.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 228% (better) | 58.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 94.1% |
| Operating margin | 25.8% | – |
| Net margin | 15.0% | 25.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 8.9% | 19.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 9.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.30 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.62 | – |
| Interest coverage | 8.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.95 (better) | 0.74 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.12 | 3.01 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.7% (better) | 0.75% |
| Payout ratio | 42.1% | 10.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 15.8% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.01% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.7% (better) | 0.75% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.7% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 4.6% | 1.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.9M (better) | −$4.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.2% | 7.2% |
Go deeper
- MUR stock overview
- MUR income statement
- MUR valuation and score
- RRC stock overview
- RRC income statement
- RRC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.