MSG Knickerbockers vs StubHub
MSGK and STUB side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MSGK and STUB compare
MSG Knickerbockers is the larger company, worth 3.6 times as much as StubHub ($7.8B against $2.1B).
MSG Knickerbockers grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.1% versus 7.9% for StubHub).
MSG Knickerbockers keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −1.3% compared with −91.3% at StubHub.
MSG Knickerbockers pays a dividend yielding 2.2%; StubHub does not pay one.
StubHub scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 2 for MSG Knickerbockers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MSGK | STUB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.8B | $2.1B |
| Share price | $322.56 | $5.58 |
| Change, 1 year | 45.8% | −70.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 80.5% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.61 | 1.60 |
| Employees | 522 | 900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 6.7× | 1.1× (better) |
| P/B | – | 1.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 236× | – |
| P/FCF | – | 3.4× |
| FCF yield | −0.00% | 29.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $34.68 | $10.39 |
| Margin of safety | −830% | 46.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.1% (better) | 7.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 22.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 82.1% |
| Operating margin | 2.7% (better) | −69.7% |
| Net margin | −1.3% (better) | −91.3% |
| FCF margin | −0.03% | 32.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | −141% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −60.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.86 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.60 | – |
| Interest coverage | 1.5× (better) | −14.5× |
| Current ratio | 0.44 | 1.04 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.93 (better) | −0.91 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.2% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 74.5% |
| Held by insiders | 41.2% | 49.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.1M (better) | −$11.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.5% | 14.8% |
Go deeper
- MSGK stock overview
- MSGK income statement
- MSGK valuation and score
- STUB stock overview
- STUB income statement
- STUB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.