MSG Knickerbockers vs Rush Street Interactive
MSGK and RSI side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MSGK and RSI compare
MSG Knickerbockers is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as Rush Street Interactive ($7.8B against $2.8B).
Rush Street Interactive grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (38.7% versus 13.1% for MSG Knickerbockers).
Rush Street Interactive keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.6% compared with −1.3% at MSG Knickerbockers.
MSG Knickerbockers pays a dividend yielding 2.2%; Rush Street Interactive does not pay one.
Rush Street Interactive scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 2 for MSG Knickerbockers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MSGK | RSI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.8B | $2.8B |
| Share price | $322.56 | $12.24 |
| Change, 1 year | 45.8% | −29.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 80.5% | −41.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.61 | 1.61 |
| Employees | 522 | 912 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 40.8× |
| P/S | 6.7× | 1.9× (better) |
| P/B | – | 14.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 236× | 12.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 13.4× |
| FCF yield | −0.00% | 7.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $34.68 | $12.86 |
| Margin of safety | −830% | 4.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.1% | 38.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 22.6% | 32.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 25.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 20.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 35.5% |
| Operating margin | 2.7% | 10.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −1.3% | 2.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.03% | 14.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 23.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.60 | – |
| Interest coverage | 1.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.44 | 2.22 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.93 | 6.30 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.48% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.2% (better) | 0.48% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 54.7% |
| Held by insiders | 41.2% | 54.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.1M (better) | −$361M |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.5% | 8.2% |
Go deeper
- MSGK stock overview
- MSGK income statement
- MSGK valuation and score
- RSI stock overview
- RSI income statement
- RSI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.