MillerKnoll vs Somnigroup International
MLKN and SGI side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MLKN and SGI compare
Somnigroup International is the larger company, worth 8.7 times as much as MillerKnoll ($13.1B against $1.5B).
On earnings, MillerKnoll is cheaper: it trades at 15.5× trailing earnings, against 25.9× for Somnigroup International.
Somnigroup International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.1% versus 1.2% for MillerKnoll).
Somnigroup International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.6% compared with 2.6% at MillerKnoll.
Both pay dividends: MillerKnoll yields 3.4% and Somnigroup International 1.1%.
MillerKnoll scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 11 for Somnigroup International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MLKN | SGI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $13.1B |
| Share price | $21.84 | $62.49 |
| Change, 1 year | 54.9% | −33.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −48.0% | 42.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.30 | 1.21 |
| Employees | 11K | 19K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.5× (better) | 25.9× |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 1.7× |
| P/B | 1.1× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.6× (better) | 14.3× |
| P/FCF | 13.0× (better) | 18.8× |
| PEG | 0.46 | – |
| FCF yield | 7.7% (better) | 5.3% |
| Fair value | $28.31 | $44.07 |
| Margin of safety | 22.9% (better) | −41.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.2% | 15.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.3% | 15.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 64.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 57.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −14.8% | 2.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.5% | 43.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.2% | 11.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.6% | 6.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.0% | 8.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 7.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 6.0% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.96 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.26 (better) | 3.81 |
| Interest coverage | 2.9× | 3.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.65 (better) | 1.23 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.85 (better) | 1.50 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.4% (better) | 1.1% |
| Payout ratio | 52.3% | 26.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 6.0% | – |
| Buyback yield | −0.55% | 0.20% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.9% (better) | 1.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.4% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 2.0% | 3.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $4.4M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.9% | 9.4% |
Go deeper
- MLKN stock overview
- MLKN income statement
- MLKN valuation and score
- SGI stock overview
- SGI income statement
- SGI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.