StockData

McGraw Hill vs Pearson

MH and PSO side by side, both in printing, publishing, and allied industries. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How MH and PSO compare

Pearson grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.70% versus −0.70% for McGraw Hill).

Pearson keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.4% compared with 3.5% at McGraw Hill.

Pearson scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 4 for McGraw Hill), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricMHPSO
Size and price
Market cap$2.2B–
Share price$11.60$17.39
Change, 1 year−17.7%31.4%
Change, 5 years–103%
Beta (5Y)0.550.38
Employees4,4004,722
StockData Score
Total score48 (better)
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score22
Performance score14 (better)
Health score02 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E30.5×–
P/S1.1×–
P/B2.5×–
EV/EBITDA7.0×–
P/FCF8.7×–
FCF yield11.5%–
Fair value$14.09–
Margin of safety17.6%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−0.70%0.70% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–1.0%
Net income growth (TTM)–−22.8%
EPS growth (TTM)–−20.2%
EPS growth, 5Y average–−59.0%
Profitability
Gross margin81.7% (better)52.0%
Operating margin13.4%14.2% (better)
Net margin3.5%9.4% (better)
FCF margin12.3%–
Return on equity8.8% (better)8.7%
Return on invested capital7.8% (better)7.6%
Financial health
Debt / equity2.880.41 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA3.572.26 (better)
Interest coverage–5.2×
Current ratio0.86–
Altman Z-score0.49–
Piotroski F-score7 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio–47.8%
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions101%4.2%
Held by insiders87.1%31.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months$1.0M–
Short interest, % of float10.6%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.