MDU Resources vs Spire
MDU and SR side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How MDU and SR compare
Spire is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as MDU Resources ($5.2B against $4.1B).
Spire grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.2% versus −0.72% for MDU Resources).
Spire keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.1% compared with 10.3% at MDU Resources.
Both pay dividends: MDU Resources yields 2.9% and Spire 3.7%.
Spire scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 6 for MDU Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | MDU | SR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.1B | $5.2B |
| Share price | $19.44 | $88.27 |
| Change, 1 year | −7.9% | −1.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −31.7% | 43.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.63 | 0.35 |
| Employees | 2,096 | 3,497 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.9× | – |
| P/S | 2.2× | 1.9× (better) |
| P/B | 1.4× (better) | 1.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.4× (better) | 13.2× |
| FCF yield | −7.8% | −4.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $18.44 | $76.92 |
| Margin of safety | −5.4% (better) | −14.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.72% | 19.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −19.5% | 5.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 13.8% | 92.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −13.8% | 24.9% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 17.1% | 21.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 10.3% | 20.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | −17.2% | −8.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 6.8% | 15.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 5.5% (better) | 5.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.87 (better) | 1.96 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.80 (better) | 7.55 |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× (better) | 2.2× |
| Current ratio | 0.88 (better) | 0.37 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.06 (better) | 0.67 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.9% | 3.7% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 59.9% | 34.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −8.3% | 4.7% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −4.2% | −0.00% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −1.3% | 3.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.3% | 90.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.81% | 2.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $104K (better) | −$56.6K |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.0% | – |
Go deeper
- MDU stock overview
- MDU income statement
- MDU valuation and score
- SR stock overview
- SR income statement
- SR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.