LTC Properties vs Safehold
LTC and SAFE side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LTC and SAFE compare
LTC Properties is the larger company, worth 3.2 times as much as Safehold ($2.4B against $742M).
On earnings, Safehold is cheaper: it trades at 6.5× trailing earnings, against 16.1× for LTC Properties.
LTC Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (59.8% versus 16.5% for Safehold).
LTC Properties keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 38.9% compared with 26.2% at Safehold.
Both pay dividends: LTC Properties yields 4.8% and Safehold 6.8%.
Safehold scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 19 for LTC Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LTC | SAFE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.4B | $742M |
| Share price | $43.88 | $10.48 |
| Change, 1 year | 20.9% | −21.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 28.2% | −91.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.41 | 1.00 |
| Employees | 25 | 72 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 5 | 5 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.1× | 6.5× (better) |
| P/S | 6.8× | 1.7× (better) |
| P/B | 1.9× | 0.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.2× | 7.7× (better) |
| PEG | 30.06 | – |
| Fair value | $46.70 | $25.96 |
| Margin of safety | 6.0% | 59.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 59.8% (better) | 16.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.5% (better) | 3.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 62.7% (better) | 2.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 50.0% (better) | 3.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 0.81% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 99.1% |
| Operating margin | 62.6% (better) | 24.9% |
| Net margin | 38.9% (better) | 26.2% |
| Return on equity | 12.2% (better) | 4.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 19.8% (better) | 4.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.19 (better) | 0.23 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.8% | 6.8% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 83.3% | 44.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | 10.5% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −12.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −7.3% | 6.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 79.7% | 68.7% |
| Held by insiders | 2.2% | 4.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.1M (better) | −$138K |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.5% | 4.9% |
Go deeper
- LTC stock overview
- LTC income statement
- LTC valuation and score
- SAFE stock overview
- SAFE income statement
- SAFE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.