Lazard vs TPG
LAZ and TPG side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How LAZ and TPG compare
TPG is the larger company, worth 4.2 times as much as Lazard ($18.6B against $4.4B).
TPG grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (30.1% versus 9.0% for Lazard).
Lazard keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.5% compared with 4.7% at TPG.
Both pay dividends: Lazard yields 3.7% and TPG 5.8%.
TPG scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for Lazard), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | LAZ | TPG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.4B | $18.6B |
| Share price | $40.40 | $48.26 |
| Change, 1 year | −22.2% | −17.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −12.7% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.40 | 1.59 |
| Employees | 3,309 | 1,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 24.5× | – |
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 3.7× |
| P/B | 4.7× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 6.5× | – |
| FCF yield | 15.4% | – |
| Fair value | $35.79 | $29.57 |
| Margin of safety | −12.9% (better) | −63.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.0% | 30.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.8% | 17.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −32.4% | 279% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −34.5% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −9.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 7.9% | – |
| Net margin | 5.5% (better) | 4.7% |
| FCF margin | 20.3% | – |
| Return on equity | 20.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 3.0× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 2.15 (better) | 1.40 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.7% | 5.8% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 104% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.2% | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.8% (better) | 5.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.5% | 37.8% |
| Held by insiders | 4.9% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.7M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.4% | – |
Go deeper
- LAZ stock overview
- LAZ income statement
- LAZ valuation and score
- TPG stock overview
- TPG income statement
- TPG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.