Kadant vs nVent Electric
KAI and NVT side by side, both in special industry machinery, except metalworking. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How KAI and NVT compare
nVent Electric is the larger company, worth 5.3 times as much as Kadant ($18.5B against $3.5B).
On earnings, nVent Electric is cheaper: it trades at 27.7× trailing earnings, against 29.7× for Kadant.
nVent Electric grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (48.0% versus 16.6% for Kadant).
nVent Electric keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.8% compared with 9.8% at Kadant.
Both pay dividends: Kadant yields 0.48% and nVent Electric 0.55%.
Kadant scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 15 for nVent Electric), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | KAI | NVT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.5B | $18.5B |
| Share price | $294.21 | $114.69 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.9% | 2.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 25.3% | 210% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.00 | 1.34 |
| Employees | 3,900 | 12K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 15 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 29.7× | 27.7× (better) |
| P/S | 2.9× (better) | 3.5× |
| P/B | 3.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.5× (better) | 20.8× |
| P/FCF | 20.0× (better) | 28.8× |
| PEG | – | 1.27 |
| FCF yield | 5.0% (better) | 3.5% |
| Fair value | $283.20 | $119.14 |
| Margin of safety | −3.9% | 3.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.6% | 48.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.6% | 14.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.8% (better) | 12.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 14.5% (better) | 14.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 12.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 44.4% (better) | 36.6% |
| Operating margin | 15.4% | 17.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 9.8% | 12.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 14.6% (better) | 12.1% |
| Return on equity | 11.7% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 10.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.43 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.31 | 1.12 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 8.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.49 (better) | 2.40 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.53 (better) | 4.45 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 0.55% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 14.1% | 19.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 7.2% (better) | 2.7% |
| Buyback yield | −0.07% | 0.54% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.41% | 1.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 111% | 91.2% |
| Held by insiders | 1.2% | 0.82% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$861K (better) | −$32.4M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.8% | 3.5% |
Go deeper
- KAI stock overview
- KAI income statement
- KAI valuation and score
- NVT stock overview
- NVT income statement
- NVT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.