ITT vs Nordson
ITT and NDSN side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ITT and NDSN compare
ITT and Nordson are about the same size, with market caps of $18.9B and $18.1B.
On earnings, Nordson is cheaper: it trades at 32.8× trailing earnings, against 43.5× for ITT.
ITT grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (35.8% versus 7.0% for Nordson).
Nordson keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.6% compared with 8.1% at ITT.
Both pay dividends: ITT yields 0.71% and Nordson 1.0%.
Nordson scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 15 for ITT), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ITT | NDSN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $18.9B | $18.1B |
| Share price | $211.18 | $324.74 |
| Change, 1 year | 11.3% | 37.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 103% | 21.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.30 | 1.02 |
| Employees | 12K | 8,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 43.5× | 32.8× (better) |
| P/S | 3.6× (better) | 6.1× |
| P/B | 4.0× (better) | 5.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 21.7× (better) | 22.5× |
| P/FCF | 29.2× | 25.0× (better) |
| PEG | 3.70 | – |
| FCF yield | 3.4% | 4.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $144.00 | $242.13 |
| Margin of safety | −46.7% | −34.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 35.8% (better) | 7.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.7% (better) | 5.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −13.5% | 22.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −19.3% | 24.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 49.1% (better) | 14.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 35.7% | 55.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 14.0% | 26.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 8.1% | 18.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 12.5% | 24.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.3% | 17.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 9.1% | 13.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.74 | 0.53 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.94 | 1.84 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 5.4× | 8.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.29 | 1.82 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.04 | 6.26 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.71% | 1.0% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 31.5% | 33.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 15.7% (better) | 15.6% |
| Buyback yield | 0.93% | 1.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.6% | 2.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.7% | 76.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.60% | 0.55% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$12.9M (better) | −$23.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.3% | 2.2% |
Go deeper
- ITT stock overview
- ITT income statement
- ITT valuation and score
- NDSN stock overview
- NDSN income statement
- NDSN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.