Ingersoll Rand vs ITT
IR and ITT side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How IR and ITT compare
Ingersoll Rand is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as ITT ($32.8B against $19.2B).
On earnings, Ingersoll Rand is cheaper: it trades at 24.0× trailing earnings, against 44.2× for ITT.
ITT grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (35.8% versus 8.0% for Ingersoll Rand).
Ingersoll Rand keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.2% compared with 8.1% at ITT.
Both pay dividends: Ingersoll Rand yields 0.09% and ITT 0.70%.
Ingersoll Rand scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 15 for ITT), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | IR | ITT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $32.8B | $19.2B |
| Share price | $85.31 | $214.59 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.3% | 12.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 38.8% | 106% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.11 | 1.30 |
| Employees | 21K | 12K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 15 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 24.0× (better) | 44.2× |
| P/S | 4.1× | 3.7× (better) |
| P/B | 3.1× (better) | 4.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.1× (better) | 22.0× |
| P/FCF | 21.6× (better) | 29.7× |
| PEG | – | 3.76 |
| FCF yield | 4.6% (better) | 3.4% |
| Fair value | $125.44 | $143.68 |
| Margin of safety | 32.0% (better) | −49.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.0% | 35.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.0% (better) | 9.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 154% (better) | −13.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 163% (better) | −19.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 49.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 43.1% (better) | 35.7% |
| Operating margin | 22.9% (better) | 14.0% |
| Net margin | 17.2% (better) | 8.1% |
| FCF margin | 18.8% (better) | 12.5% |
| Return on equity | 13.4% (better) | 11.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 11.5% (better) | 9.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.45 (better) | 0.74 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.42 (better) | 2.94 |
| Interest coverage | 7.2× (better) | 5.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.69 (better) | 1.29 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.64 (better) | 3.07 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.09% | 0.70% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 2.2% | 31.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 13 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 15.7% |
| Buyback yield | 3.1% (better) | 0.91% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.2% (better) | 1.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 98.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.21% | 0.60% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$59.4M | −$12.8M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.8% | 7.3% |
Go deeper
- IR stock overview
- IR income statement
- IR valuation and score
- ITT stock overview
- ITT income statement
- ITT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.