Henry Schein vs WESCO International
HSIC and WCC side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HSIC and WCC compare
WESCO International is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Henry Schein ($15.7B against $9.6B).
On earnings, WESCO International is cheaper: it trades at 20.0× trailing earnings, against 25.1× for Henry Schein.
WESCO International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.5% versus 6.5% for Henry Schein).
WESCO International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.0% compared with 3.0% at Henry Schein.
WESCO International pays a dividend yielding 0.61%; Henry Schein does not pay one.
WESCO International scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 6 for Henry Schein), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HSIC | WCC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.6B | $15.7B |
| Share price | $86.14 | $321.79 |
| Change, 1 year | 17.6% | 20.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 13.1% | 136% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.55 | 1.65 |
| Employees | 25K | 21K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.1× | 20.0× (better) |
| P/S | 0.7× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 3.0× | 2.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.5× | 12.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 16.9× (better) | 37.7× |
| FCF yield | 5.9% (better) | 2.7% |
| Fair value | $72.31 | $264.08 |
| Margin of safety | −19.1% (better) | −21.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.5% | 13.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | 13.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 3.6% | 22.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 10.3% | 26.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 3.0% | 53.9% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.3% (better) | 21.5% |
| Operating margin | 5.0% | 5.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 3.0% | 3.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 4.2% (better) | 1.6% |
| Return on equity | 12.2% | 15.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 8.1% | 10.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.10 (better) | 1.10 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.28 | 3.12 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 4.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.32 | 2.01 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.77 | 3.17 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.61% |
| Payout ratio | – | 12.0% |
| Buyback yield | 7.6% (better) | 0.48% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.6% (better) | 1.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 110% | 96.9% |
| Held by insiders | 18.0% | 2.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.9M (better) | −$62.6M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.2% | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- HSIC stock overview
- HSIC income statement
- HSIC valuation and score
- WCC stock overview
- WCC income statement
- WCC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.