HF Foods vs US Foods
HFFG and USFD side by side, both in groceries and related products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How HFFG and USFD compare
US Foods is the larger company, worth 281 times as much as HF Foods ($23.5B against $83.5M).
US Foods grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.1% versus 3.1% for HF Foods).
US Foods keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.0% compared with −3.0% at HF Foods.
US Foods scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for HF Foods), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | HFFG | USFD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $83.5M | $23.5B |
| Share price | $1.55 | $108.45 |
| Change, 1 year | −32.6% | 48.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −79.7% | 227% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.06 | 0.93 |
| Employees | 949 | 30K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 30.3× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.6× |
| P/B | 0.4× (better) | 5.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 15.6× |
| P/FCF | 6.0× (better) | 22.3× |
| PEG | – | 0.71 |
| FCF yield | 16.6% (better) | 4.5% |
| Fair value | $7.84 | $85.44 |
| Margin of safety | 80.2% (better) | −26.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.1% | 3.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.7% (better) | 11.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 42.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 49.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.6% | 17.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | −3.0% | 3.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −3.0% | 2.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.1% | 2.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | −17.1% | 18.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −9.1% | 10.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.65 (better) | 1.18 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.76 |
| Interest coverage | −3.0× | 4.4× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.09 | 1.11 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.11 | 4.88 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 4.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 4.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 16.2% | 109% |
| Held by insiders | 9.1% | 0.82% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $41.0K (better) | −$14.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.65% | 7.0% |
Go deeper
- HFFG stock overview
- HFFG income statement
- HFFG valuation and score
- USFD stock overview
- USFD income statement
- USFD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.