Grindr vs ZipRecruiter
GRND and ZIP side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GRND and ZIP compare
Grindr is the larger company, worth 5.0 times as much as ZipRecruiter ($2.4B against $487M).
On earnings, ZipRecruiter is cheaper: it trades at 11.4× trailing earnings, against 45.3× for Grindr.
Grindr grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (30.1% versus 3.0% for ZipRecruiter).
Grindr keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.9% compared with 9.3% at ZipRecruiter.
Grindr scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for ZipRecruiter), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GRND | ZIP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.4B | $487M |
| Share price | $14.05 | $5.92 |
| Change, 1 year | −7.4% | 32.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 39.0% | −81.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.17 | 1.79 |
| Employees | 165 | 800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 45.3× | 11.4× (better) |
| P/S | 4.6× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 24.1× | 19.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 16.4× | 14.2× (better) |
| PEG | 0.18 | – |
| FCF yield | 6.1% | 7.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $9.75 | $9.74 |
| Margin of safety | −44.0% | 39.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 30.1% (better) | 3.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 1.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 75.1% | 89.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 20.7% (better) | 3.8% |
| Net margin | 10.9% (better) | 9.3% |
| FCF margin | 27.9% (better) | 7.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 22.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.88 | 2.54 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.7× |
| Current ratio | 1.16 | 3.28 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.48 (better) | 2.89 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 4.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 4.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 23.2% | 63.5% |
| Held by insiders | 95.5% | 49.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$69.4M | −$2.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 129% | 7.5% |
Go deeper
- GRND stock overview
- GRND income statement
- GRND valuation and score
- ZIP stock overview
- ZIP income statement
- ZIP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.