Global Industrial vs Willis Lease Finance
GIC and WLFC side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GIC and WLFC compare
Global Industrial is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Willis Lease Finance ($1.8B against $973M).
On earnings, Willis Lease Finance is cheaper: it trades at 11.5× trailing earnings, against 20.8× for Global Industrial.
Willis Lease Finance grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.3% versus 8.4% for Global Industrial).
Willis Lease Finance keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.0% compared with 6.1% at Global Industrial.
Both pay dividends: Global Industrial yields 1.8% and Willis Lease Finance 1.2%.
Global Industrial scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 14 for Willis Lease Finance), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GIC | WLFC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.8B | $973M |
| Share price | $46.63 | $46.04 |
| Change, 1 year | 72.7% | 13.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 6.9% | 256% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.94 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 1,980 | 475 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 14 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.8× | 11.5× (better) |
| P/S | 1.2× (better) | 1.3× |
| P/B | 5.2× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.7× | 4.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 20.4× | 3.9× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.04 |
| FCF yield | 4.9% | 25.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $39.73 | $82.90 |
| Margin of safety | −17.4% | 44.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.4% | 17.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.0% | 20.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 31.6% (better) | −25.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 31.0% (better) | −28.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 1.6% | 71.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.4% | – |
| Operating margin | 8.1% | 15.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.1% | 12.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 6.1% | 32.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 26.9% (better) | 13.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 33.6% (better) | 30.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.9× |
| Current ratio | 2.24 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 7.44 (better) | 0.76 |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.8% (better) | 1.2% |
| Payout ratio | 48.0% | 12.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −21.8% | – |
| Buyback yield | −0.11% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.7% (better) | 1.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 34.0% | 57.7% |
| Held by insiders | 63.6% | 56.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.2M (better) | −$21.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.9% | 18.2% |
Go deeper
- GIC stock overview
- GIC income statement
- GIC valuation and score
- WLFC stock overview
- WLFC income statement
- WLFC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.