Graham vs Greenland Technologies
GHM and GTEC side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GHM and GTEC compare
Graham is the larger company, worth 75 times as much as Greenland Technologies ($979M against $13.0M).
On earnings, Greenland Technologies is cheaper: it trades at 1.0× trailing earnings, against 72.5× for Graham.
Greenland Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.9% versus 16.2% for Graham).
Greenland Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.1% compared with 5.0% at Graham.
Greenland Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 15 for Graham), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GHM | GTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $979M | $13.0M |
| Share price | $83.42 | $0.490 |
| Change, 1 year | 37.0% | −59.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 540% | −95.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.11 | 1.56 |
| Employees | 732 | 15 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 72.5× | 1.0× (better) |
| P/S | 3.7× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 4.9× | 0.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 35.0× (better) | −1.9× |
| P/FCF | 33.9× | – |
| PEG | 0.31 | 0.01 (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.0% (better) | −7.3% |
| Fair value | $59.30 | $7.51 |
| Margin of safety | −40.7% | 93.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.2% | 20.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.3% (better) | 6.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −2.2% (better) | −10.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −6.5% (better) | −51.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 36.1% (better) | −14.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.0% | 33.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 6.0% | 17.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 5.0% | 12.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 10.9% (better) | −0.91% |
| Return on equity | 8.2% | 14.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 11.5% | 32.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.03 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −2.76 | −2.28 |
| Current ratio | 1.24 | 1.97 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.47 (better) | 2.06 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 36.7% |
| Buyback yield | −5.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −5.2% | 0.00% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.0% | 1.7% |
| Held by insiders | 6.3% | 22.7% |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.4% | 0.60% |
Go deeper
- GHM stock overview
- GHM income statement
- GHM valuation and score
- GTEC stock overview
- GTEC income statement
- GTEC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.