Graham vs Gorman Rupp
GHM and GRC side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GHM and GRC compare
Gorman Rupp is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Graham ($1.8B against $979M).
On earnings, Gorman Rupp is cheaper: it trades at 24.9× trailing earnings, against 72.5× for Graham.
Graham grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.2% versus 6.5% for Gorman Rupp).
Gorman Rupp keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.2% compared with 5.0% at Graham.
Gorman Rupp pays a dividend yielding 1.1%; Graham does not pay one.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GHM | GRC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $979M | $1.8B |
| Share price | $83.42 | $69.66 |
| Change, 1 year | 37.0% | 55.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 540% | 53.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.11 | 0.80 |
| Employees | 732 | 1,415 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 | 15 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 72.5× | 24.9× (better) |
| P/S | 3.7× | 2.5× (better) |
| P/B | 4.9× | 4.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 35.0× | 14.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 33.9× | 16.7× (better) |
| PEG | 0.31 | – |
| FCF yield | 3.0% | 6.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $59.30 | $67.98 |
| Margin of safety | −40.7% | −2.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.2% (better) | 6.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.3% (better) | 14.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −2.2% | 46.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −6.5% | 46.6% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 36.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.0% | 32.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 6.0% | 16.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 5.0% | 10.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 10.9% | 15.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 8.2% | 17.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 11.5% | 13.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.54 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −2.76 | 1.40 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 6.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.24 | 2.70 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.47 | 4.87 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.1% |
| Buyback yield | −5.2% | 0.14% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −5.2% | 1.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.0% | 66.0% |
| Held by insiders | 6.3% | 14.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$400K |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.4% | 3.2% |
Go deeper
- GHM stock overview
- GHM income statement
- GHM valuation and score
- GRC stock overview
- GRC income statement
- GRC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.