GEN Restaurant vs MasterBeef
GENK and MB side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GENK and MB compare
GEN Restaurant grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−4.3% versus −8.9% for MasterBeef).
GEN Restaurant scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 1 for MasterBeef), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GENK | MB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.3M | – |
| Share price | $0.950 | $3.87 |
| Change, 1 year | −64.3% | −51.1% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −74.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.09 | −0.84 |
| Employees | 2,700 | 336 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.0× | – |
| FCF yield | −354% | – |
| Fair value | $15.78 | – |
| Margin of safety | 94.0% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.3% (better) | −8.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −224% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −14.7% | – |
| Net margin | −2.3% | – |
| FCF margin | −9.0% | −3.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Current ratio | 0.25 | 1.55 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.20 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 1.8% | – |
| Held by insiders | 58.9% | 72.7% |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.2% | – |
Go deeper
- GENK stock overview
- GENK income statement
- GENK valuation and score
- MB stock overview
- MB income statement
- MB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.