FrontView REIT vs Transcontinental Realty Investors
FVR and TCI side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FVR and TCI compare
FrontView REIT and Transcontinental Realty Investors are about the same size, with market caps of $459M and $419M.
FrontView REIT grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.4% versus 4.9% for Transcontinental Realty Investors).
Transcontinental Realty Investors keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.1% compared with −0.04% at FrontView REIT.
FrontView REIT pays a dividend yielding 4.6%; Transcontinental Realty Investors does not pay one.
Transcontinental Realty Investors scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for FrontView REIT), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FVR | TCI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $459M | $419M |
| Share price | $18.75 | $47.79 |
| Change, 1 year | 37.8% | 5.9% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 25.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.67 | 0.15 |
| Employees | 22 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 56.9× |
| P/S | 6.4× (better) | 8.2× |
| P/B | 0.9× | 0.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 75.2× |
| Fair value | $16.59 | $30.71 |
| Margin of safety | −13.0% (better) | −55.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.4% (better) | 4.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −3.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 28.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 31.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 15.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | −19.8% |
| Net margin | −0.04% | 14.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | −0.01% | 0.85% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | −1.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | −1.1× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.79 | 1.67 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.6% (better) | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Shareholder yield | 4.6% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.1% | 3.8% |
| Held by insiders | 9.7% | 85.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $7.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.5% | 1.7% |
Go deeper
- FVR stock overview
- FVR income statement
- FVR valuation and score
- TCI stock overview
- TCI income statement
- TCI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.