FRP vs Tejon Ranch
FRPH and TRC side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FRPH and TRC compare
Tejon Ranch is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as FRP ($467M against $354M).
Tejon Ranch grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (45.4% versus 2.6% for FRP).
Tejon Ranch keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.4% compared with −1.7% at FRP.
Tejon Ranch scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 1 for FRP), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FRPH | TRC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $354M | $467M |
| Share price | $18.45 | $17.29 |
| Change, 1 year | −22.1% | 6.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −38.4% | −12.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.48 | 0.67 |
| Employees | 25 | 65 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 59.6× |
| P/S | 8.1× | 6.9× (better) |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 1.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.8× (better) | 42.7× |
| FCF yield | −16.9% | – |
| Fair value | $16.47 | $13.20 |
| Margin of safety | −12.0% (better) | −31.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.6% | 45.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.7% (better) | 5.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −116% | 158% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −117% | 142% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −22.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 33.1% |
| Operating margin | 11.6% (better) | 5.8% |
| Net margin | −1.7% | 11.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | −137% | – |
| Return on equity | −0.17% | 1.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.2% (better) | 0.50% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 1.8× | – |
| Current ratio | – | 1.85 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.74 | 2.27 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 47.9% | 78.5% |
| Held by insiders | 24.4% | 5.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $10.1M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.7% | 6.3% |
Go deeper
- FRPH stock overview
- FRPH income statement
- FRPH valuation and score
- TRC stock overview
- TRC income statement
- TRC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.