Friedman Industries vs Metallus
FRD and MTUS side by side, both in steel works, blast furnaces, and rolling and finishing mills. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FRD and MTUS compare
Metallus is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Friedman Industries ($728M against $276M).
On earnings, Friedman Industries is cheaper: it trades at 6.7× trailing earnings, against 117× for Metallus.
Friedman Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.6% compared with 0.66% at Metallus.
Friedman Industries pays a dividend yielding 0.42%; Metallus does not pay one.
Friedman Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 7 for Metallus), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FRD | MTUS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $276M | $728M |
| Share price | $38.31 | $17.57 |
| Change, 1 year | 74.5% | 8.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 190% | 16.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.29 | 1.37 |
| Employees | 381 | 1,865 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 22 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 6.7× (better) | 117× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 0.6× |
| P/B | 1.5× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.5× | – |
| FCF yield | −1.00% | – |
| Fair value | $84.10 | $17.46 |
| Margin of safety | 54.4% (better) | −0.61% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 73.7% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 38.7% (better) | 6.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 255% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 250% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 8.3% (better) | 8.2% |
| Operating margin | 8.3% | – |
| Net margin | 4.6% (better) | 0.66% |
| FCF margin | −0.31% | – |
| Return on equity | 25.5% (better) | 1.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 34.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.02 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.03 | – |
| Interest coverage | 14.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.68 (better) | 1.75 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.41 (better) | 2.24 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.42% | – |
| Payout ratio | 2.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.03% | 1.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.45% | 1.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 53.4% | 86.1% |
| Held by insiders | 6.9% | 15.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $73.9K (better) | −$2.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | 5.3% |
Go deeper
- FRD stock overview
- FRD income statement
- FRD valuation and score
- MTUS stock overview
- MTUS income statement
- MTUS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.