Five Point vs Tejon Ranch
FPH and TRC side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FPH and TRC compare
Five Point is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Tejon Ranch ($662M against $477M).
Tejon Ranch grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (45.4% versus −39.1% for Five Point).
Five Point keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 24.9% compared with 11.4% at Tejon Ranch.
Tejon Ranch scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 9 for Five Point), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FPH | TRC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $662M | $477M |
| Share price | $4.47 | $17.65 |
| Change, 1 year | −25.7% | 9.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −30.7% | −11.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.88 | 0.67 |
| Employees | 90 | 65 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 60.9× |
| P/S | 5.6× (better) | 7.1× |
| P/B | – | 1.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.0× (better) | 43.6× |
| P/FCF | 110× | – |
| FCF yield | 0.91% | – |
| Fair value | $8.47 | $13.23 |
| Margin of safety | 47.2% (better) | −33.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −39.1% | 45.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −6.5% | 5.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −68.8% | 158% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 142% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 33.1% |
| Operating margin | – | 5.8% |
| Net margin | 24.9% (better) | 11.4% |
| FCF margin | 5.1% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 1.6% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 0.50% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | – | 1.85 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.62 | 2.31 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 25.3% | 78.5% |
| Held by insiders | 21.0% | 5.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$693K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.59% | 6.3% |
Go deeper
- FPH stock overview
- FPH income statement
- FPH valuation and score
- TRC stock overview
- TRC income statement
- TRC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.