Forestar vs St Joe
FOR and JOE side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FOR and JOE compare
St Joe is the larger company, worth 3.5 times as much as Forestar ($4.0B against $1.1B).
On earnings, Forestar is cheaper: it trades at 6.7× trailing earnings, against 33.2× for St Joe.
Forestar grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.8% versus 11.1% for St Joe).
St Joe keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 22.3% compared with 9.9% at Forestar.
St Joe pays a dividend yielding 0.68%; Forestar does not pay one.
St Joe scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 14 for Forestar), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FOR | JOE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.1B | $4.0B |
| Share price | $22.30 | $70.36 |
| Change, 1 year | −9.8% | 17.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 7.0% | 37.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.89 | 1.04 |
| Employees | 78 | 906 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 6.7× (better) | 33.2× |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 7.3× |
| P/B | 0.6× (better) | 5.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.2× (better) | 17.6× |
| P/FCF | 4.0× (better) | 21.6× |
| PEG | – | 1.84 |
| FCF yield | 24.9% (better) | 4.6% |
| Fair value | $38.06 | $53.49 |
| Margin of safety | 41.4% (better) | −31.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.8% (better) | 11.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.3% | 26.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.7% | 15.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 4.4% | 17.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 21.2% (better) | 20.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.4% | 46.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | – | 32.0% |
| Net margin | 9.9% | 22.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 16.4% | 33.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 9.6% | 15.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 20.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 6.2× |
| Altman Z-score | 1.53 | 4.60 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.68% |
| Payout ratio | – | 30.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 6 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 52.6% |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 36.8% | 88.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.33% | 68.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$232K (better) | −$82.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.0% | 4.8% |
Go deeper
- FOR stock overview
- FOR income statement
- FOR valuation and score
- JOE stock overview
- JOE income statement
- JOE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.