StockData

Finance of America Companies vs UWM

FOA and UWMC side by side, both in non-depository credit institutions. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FOA and UWMC compare

UWM is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as Finance of America Companies ($2.0B against $189M).

UWM keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.55% compared with −19.2% at Finance of America Companies.

UWM pays a dividend yielding 23.6%; Finance of America Companies does not pay one.

UWM scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Finance of America Companies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFOAUWMC
Size and price
Market cap$189M$2.0B
Share price$10.94$1.27
Change, 1 year−53.2%−76.8%
Change, 5 years−79.0%−80.3%
Beta (5Y)0.721.00
Employees7842,200
StockData Score
Total score79 (better)
Valuation score11
Growth score11
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score44
Dividend score03 (better)
Valuation
P/S1.0×0.6× (better)
EV/EBITDA–17.3×
FCF yield–−89.2%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)–20.8%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−22.7%−8.5% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–16.3%
Profitability
Net margin−19.2%0.55% (better)
FCF margin–−51.3%
Financial health
Altman Z-score−0.020.28 (better)
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–23.6%
Payout ratio–598%
Buyback yield43.2%–
Shareholder yield43.2% (better)23.6%
Ownership
Held by institutions27.7%17.1%
Held by insiders–93.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$95.7M (better)−$343M
Superinvestors holding11
Short interest, % of float–90.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.