Funko vs Hasbro
FNKO and HAS side by side, both in dolls, toys, games and sporting and athletic. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FNKO and HAS compare
Hasbro is the larger company, worth 44 times as much as Funko ($16.9B against $388M).
On earnings, Hasbro is cheaper: it trades at 18.0× trailing earnings, against 98.7× for Funko.
Hasbro grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.6% versus 1.2% for Funko).
Hasbro keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.6% compared with 0.49% at Funko.
Hasbro pays a dividend yielding 2.3%; Funko does not pay one.
Hasbro scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 6 for Funko), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FNKO | HAS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $388M | $16.9B |
| Share price | $6.91 | $120.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 87.3% | 52.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −60.7% | 20.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.93 | 0.83 |
| Employees | 1,104 | 4,520 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 98.7× | 18.0× (better) |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 2.8× |
| P/B | 2.0× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.8× (better) | 13.4× |
| P/FCF | 8.0× (better) | 13.8× |
| FCF yield | 12.5% (better) | 7.3% |
| Fair value | $3.37 | $125.34 |
| Margin of safety | −105% | 3.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.2% | 27.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.8% (better) | −0.37% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 46.3% | 78.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.6% | 21.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.49% | 15.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.2% | 20.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 2.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 5.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.99 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.64 (better) | 1.82 |
| Interest coverage | – | 7.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.19 | 1.40 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.79 | 4.11 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 41.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.58% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.0% | 99.1% |
| Held by insiders | 11.6% | 0.64% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.4M (better) | −$51.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 16.6% | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- FNKO stock overview
- FNKO income statement
- FNKO valuation and score
- HAS stock overview
- HAS income statement
- HAS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.