flyExclusive vs Bristow
FLYX and VTOL side by side, both in transportation by air. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FLYX and VTOL compare
Bristow is the larger company, worth 12 times as much as flyExclusive ($1.2B against $100M).
flyExclusive grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.5% versus 10.1% for Bristow).
Bristow keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.0% compared with −5.8% at flyExclusive.
Bristow pays a dividend yielding 0.93%; flyExclusive does not pay one.
Bristow scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 5 for flyExclusive), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FLYX | VTOL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $100M | $1.2B |
| Share price | $0.980 | $40.30 |
| Change, 1 year | −69.8% | 6.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −89.9% | 22.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.27 | 1.11 |
| Employees | 120 | 3,660 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 15.0× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | – | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 6.7× |
| P/FCF | – | 97.5× |
| FCF yield | −17.3% | 1.0% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $48.91 |
| Margin of safety | – | 17.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.5% (better) | 10.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 45.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −43.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −43.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 20.1% | – |
| Operating margin | −7.6% | 9.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −5.8% | 5.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | −4.1% | 0.76% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 7.5% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 8.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.68 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.99 |
| Interest coverage | −1.4× | 3.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.30 | 1.99 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −1.15 | 1.88 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.93% |
| Buyback yield | −21.4% | 3.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −21.4% | 4.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 27.3% | 100% |
| Held by insiders | 96.8% | 18.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $305K (better) | −$10.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 75.0% | 4.7% |
Go deeper
- FLYX stock overview
- FLYX income statement
- FLYX valuation and score
- VTOL stock overview
- VTOL income statement
- VTOL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.