Flowco vs Cactus
FLOC and WHD side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FLOC and WHD compare
Cactus is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Flowco ($5.0B against $1.9B).
Cactus grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (40.4% versus 20.4% for Flowco).
Cactus keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.0% compared with 6.4% at Flowco.
Both pay dividends: Flowco yields 1.6% and Cactus 0.92%.
Cactus scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 9 for Flowco), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FLOC | WHD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.9B | $5.0B |
| Share price | $21.28 | $62.28 |
| Change, 1 year | 27.3% | 46.4% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 64.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.90 | 1.20 |
| Employees | 1,281 | 1,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 2.1× (better) | 3.3× |
| P/B | 3.5× (better) | 3.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.2× (better) | 12.1× |
| P/FCF | 8.1× | – |
| FCF yield | 12.4% | – |
| Fair value | $9.97 | $47.57 |
| Margin of safety | −113% | −30.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.4% | 40.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 25.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 6.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 53.9% (better) | 33.5% |
| Operating margin | 18.6% | 18.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.4% | 12.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 26.4% | – |
| Return on equity | 12.5% | 14.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 23.7% | 26.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.67 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.65 | – |
| Interest coverage | 8.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.19 (better) | 3.06 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.73 | 5.46 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.6% (better) | 0.92% |
| Payout ratio | – | 21.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 8.4% |
| Buyback yield | 0.86% (better) | 0.16% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.5% (better) | 1.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 48.3% | 95.7% |
| Held by insiders | 53.2% | 14.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$384M | −$90.1M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.0% | 4.3% |
Go deeper
- FLOC stock overview
- FLOC income statement
- FLOC valuation and score
- WHD stock overview
- WHD income statement
- WHD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.