National Beverage vs Westrock Coffee
FIZZ and WEST side by side, both in beverages. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FIZZ and WEST compare
National Beverage is the larger company, worth 4.1 times as much as Westrock Coffee ($3.4B against $839M).
Westrock Coffee grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.3% versus −1.8% for National Beverage).
National Beverage keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.8% compared with −4.4% at Westrock Coffee.
National Beverage pays a dividend yielding 8.8%; Westrock Coffee does not pay one.
National Beverage scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 5 for Westrock Coffee), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FIZZ | WEST |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.4B | $839M |
| Share price | $36.74 | $8.59 |
| Change, 1 year | 12.0% | 106% |
| Change, 5 years | −38.9% | −11.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.52 | 0.58 |
| Employees | 1,677 | 1,393 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.8× | – |
| P/S | 2.9× | 0.7× (better) |
| P/B | 9.4× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.8× (better) | 20.1× |
| P/FCF | 21.2× (better) | 27.8× |
| PEG | 2.23 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.7% (better) | 3.6% |
| Fair value | $42.31 | – |
| Margin of safety | 13.2% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.8% | 16.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.9% | 16.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −5.9% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −6.5% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 1.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.2% (better) | 13.1% |
| Operating margin | 18.4% (better) | −0.30% |
| Net margin | 14.8% (better) | −4.4% |
| FCF margin | 13.7% (better) | 2.4% |
| Return on equity | 40.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 64.6% (better) | −0.71% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 6.49 |
| Interest coverage | – | −0.1× |
| Current ratio | 2.39 (better) | 0.89 |
| Altman Z-score | 14.10 (better) | 0.93 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 8.8% | – |
| Payout ratio | 174% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 8.8% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 26.3% | 49.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.22% | 57.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $7.9K | $1.1M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | 13.5% |
Go deeper
- FIZZ stock overview
- FIZZ income statement
- FIZZ valuation and score
- WEST stock overview
- WEST income statement
- WEST valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.