Fiserv vs Sea
FISV and SE side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FISV and SE compare
Sea grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (36.4% versus −1.7% for Fiserv).
Sea keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.9% compared with −18.9% at Fiserv.
Sea scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 6 for Fiserv), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FISV | SE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $33.9B | – |
| Share price | $63.78 | $75.36 |
| Change, 1 year | −0.93% | −47.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −36.3% | −75.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.67 | 1.73 |
| Employees | 38K | 103K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.6× | – |
| P/B | 1.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 10.7× | – |
| FCF yield | 9.3% | – |
| Fair value | $101.67 | – |
| Margin of safety | 37.3% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.7% | 36.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.4% | 39.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −209% | 255% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −215% | 241% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 35.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 44.7% |
| Operating margin | −10.9% | 8.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −18.9% | 6.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 15.2% | 19.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | −17.0% | 15.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −3.5% | 166% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.29 (better) | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −1.5× | 59.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.04 | 1.58 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.02 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.0% | 62.1% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 24.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $3.8M (better) | −$543M |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | – |
Go deeper
- FISV stock overview
- FISV income statement
- FISV valuation and score
- SE stock overview
- SE income statement
- SE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.