FTAI Infrastructure vs Norfolk Southern
FIP and NSC side by side, both in industrials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FIP and NSC compare
Norfolk Southern is the larger company, worth 159 times as much as FTAI Infrastructure ($73.6B against $464M).
FTAI Infrastructure grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (67.7% versus 6.0% for Norfolk Southern).
Both pay dividends: FTAI Infrastructure yields 3.1% and Norfolk Southern 1.2%.
Norfolk Southern scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 4 for FTAI Infrastructure), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FIP | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $464M | $73.6B |
| Share price | $3.93 | $327.88 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.6% | 14.4% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 19.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.30 | 0.77 |
| Employees | 1,110 | 19K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 27.5× |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 5.7× |
| P/B | – | 4.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 16.1× |
| P/FCF | – | 44.7× |
| FCF yield | −62.7% | 2.2% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $245.31 |
| Margin of safety | – | −33.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 67.7% (better) | 6.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 48.9% (better) | 4.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −9.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −9.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 10.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 31.5% |
| Net margin | – | 20.7% |
| FCF margin | −39.5% | 12.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 16.8% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 10.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.99 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.72 |
| Interest coverage | – | 5.2× |
| Current ratio | 0.22 | 0.90 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −0.26 | 2.52 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.1% (better) | 1.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 45.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 7.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.01% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.1% (better) | 1.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.3% | 76.1% |
| Held by insiders | 38.5% | 0.05% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.6M (better) | $60.1K |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 24.5% | 2.6% |
Go deeper
- FIP stock overview
- FIP income statement
- FIP valuation and score
- NSC stock overview
- NSC income statement
- NSC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.