First Interstate BancSystem vs M&T Bank
FIBK and MTB side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FIBK and MTB compare
M&T Bank is the larger company, worth 8.8 times as much as First Interstate BancSystem ($31.7B against $3.6B).
On earnings, M&T Bank is cheaper: it trades at 11.5× trailing earnings, against 11.7× for First Interstate BancSystem.
First Interstate BancSystem grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.1% versus 5.5% for M&T Bank).
M&T Bank keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 176% compared with 29.5% at First Interstate BancSystem.
Both pay dividends: First Interstate BancSystem yields 5.0% and M&T Bank 2.7%.
First Interstate BancSystem scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 17 for M&T Bank), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FIBK | MTB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.6B | $31.7B |
| Share price | $37.67 | $219.78 |
| Change, 1 year | 16.2% | 17.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −13.2% | 39.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 0.82 |
| Employees | 3,376 | 22K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 17 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.7× | 11.5× (better) |
| P/S | 3.4× (better) | 18.5× |
| P/B | 1.1× | 1.1× (better) |
| PEG | 0.81 (better) | 0.83 |
| Fair value | $38.71 | $230.94 |
| Margin of safety | 2.7% | 4.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.1% (better) | 5.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.1% (better) | −22.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 28.4% (better) | 8.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 35.4% (better) | 18.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 3.0% | 11.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 29.5% | 176% (better) |
| Return on equity | 9.5% | 10.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.23 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.21 | 0.25 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.0% (better) | 2.7% |
| Payout ratio | 58.7% | 29.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −1.2% | – |
| Buyback yield | 9.1% (better) | 7.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 14.1% (better) | 10.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.8% | 91.4% |
| Held by insiders | 35.1% | 0.36% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.3M (better) | −$24.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.2% | 3.4% |
Go deeper
- FIBK stock overview
- FIBK income statement
- FIBK valuation and score
- MTB stock overview
- MTB income statement
- MTB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.