Franklin Covey vs Public Policy
FC and PPHC side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FC and PPHC compare
Public Policy is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Franklin Covey ($336M against $171M).
Franklin Covey keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.83% compared with −14.6% at Public Policy.
Public Policy pays a dividend yielding 3.2%; Franklin Covey does not pay one.
Franklin Covey scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 3 for Public Policy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FC | PPHC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $171M | $336M |
| Share price | $15.10 | $11.11 |
| Change, 1 year | 1.3% | – |
| Change, 5 years | −68.5% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.98 | – |
| Employees | 1,120 | 450 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 94.4× | – |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 1.6× |
| P/B | 4.0× | 2.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 24.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 8.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 11.3% (better) | −0.67% |
| Fair value | $17.85 | $7.42 |
| Margin of safety | 15.4% (better) | −49.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −6.1% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.1% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −79.5% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −79.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 75.2% (better) | 13.6% |
| Operating margin | 2.4% (better) | −18.1% |
| Net margin | 0.83% (better) | −14.6% |
| FCF margin | 7.3% (better) | −1.1% |
| Return on equity | 4.0% (better) | −30.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 10.2% (better) | −24.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.34 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 19.1× (better) | −11.9× |
| Current ratio | 0.66 | 1.17 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.68 (better) | 0.77 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 3.2% |
| Buyback yield | 18.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 18.5% (better) | 3.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 72.6% | 22.7% |
| Held by insiders | 44.7% | 15.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 (better) | −$2.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.3% | 1.7% |
Go deeper
- FC stock overview
- FC income statement
- FC valuation and score
- PPHC stock overview
- PPHC income statement
- PPHC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.