Fortune Brands Innovations vs Masco
FBIN and MAS side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FBIN and MAS compare
Masco is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as Fortune Brands Innovations ($16.4B against $5.9B).
Masco grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.95% versus −3.0% for Fortune Brands Innovations).
Both pay dividends: Fortune Brands Innovations yields 2.1% and Masco 1.1%.
Masco scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 6 for Fortune Brands Innovations), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FBIN | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.9B | $16.4B |
| Share price | $49.17 | $84.91 |
| Change, 1 year | 0.99% | 38.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −54.2% | 25.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.27 | 1.00 |
| Employees | 10K | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 18.4× |
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 2.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 34.0× | 12.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 10.6× (better) | 15.7× |
| PEG | – | 8.88 |
| FCF yield | 9.4% (better) | 6.4% |
| Fair value | $23.70 | $81.37 |
| Margin of safety | −107% | −4.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.0% | 0.95% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.3% (better) | 1.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 12.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 18.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −8.9% | −3.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 46.0% (better) | 37.6% |
| Operating margin | 5.4% | 17.9% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 12.1% |
| FCF margin | 12.7% | 13.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 46.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 8.85 | 1.73 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.2× | 12.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.83 | 1.83 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.64 | 4.13 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 8 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.1% (better) | 1.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 27.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | 12 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.60% | 17.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 1.6% | 6.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.7% | 7.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 8.9% | 0.34% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $30.6M (better) | −$7.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.4% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- FBIN stock overview
- FBIN income statement
- FBIN valuation and score
- MAS stock overview
- MAS income statement
- MAS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.