StockData

Edwards Lifesciences vs Smith & Nephew

EW and SNN side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How EW and SNN compare

Edwards Lifesciences grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.4% versus 6.1% for Smith & Nephew).

Edwards Lifesciences scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 6 for Smith & Nephew), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricEWSNN
Size and price
Market cap$61.8B–
Share price$107.15$31.28
Change, 1 year25.2%−6.5%
Change, 5 years−8.4%−9.7%
Beta (5Y)0.970.62
Employees16K18K
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)6
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score3 (better)1
Health score5 (better)4
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E60.5×–
P/S9.3×–
P/B5.7×–
EV/EBITDA35.9×–
P/FCF43.4×–
FCF yield2.3%–
Fair value$66.83–
Margin of safety−60.3%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)13.4% (better)6.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average6.7% (better)6.2%
Net income growth (TTM)−25.3%–
EPS growth (TTM)−23.7%52.3% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average7.1% (better)6.9%
Profitability
Gross margin78.0% (better)68.0%
Operating margin21.6% (better)12.9%
Net margin15.3%–
FCF margin21.3%–
Return on equity9.7%–
Return on invested capital14.4% (better)13.0%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.06 (better)0.10
Net debt / EBITDA−2.51−0.31
Interest coverage–5.7×
Current ratio4.60 (better)2.14
Altman Z-score14.43–
Piotroski F-score5–
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield1.2%–
Shareholder yield1.2%–
Ownership
Held by institutions91.0%4.2%
Held by insiders0.22%25.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$34.1M–
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float1.6%–

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.