Enbridge vs Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
ENB and EPD side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ENB and EPD compare
Enbridge grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (40.0% versus 21.5% for Enterprise Products Partners L.P.).
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.2% compared with 7.5% at Enbridge.
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. pays a dividend yielding 4.3%; Enbridge does not pay one.
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for Enbridge), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ENB | EPD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $82.7B |
| Share price | $47.67 | $38.28 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.1% | 21.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 20.0% | 76.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.36 | 0.30 |
| Employees | 15K | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 12.8× |
| P/S | – | 1.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 14.2× |
| P/FCF | – | 17.2× |
| FCF yield | – | 5.8% |
| Fair value | – | $36.09 |
| Margin of safety | – | −6.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 40.0% (better) | 21.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.8% | 14.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 11.7% | 13.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.5% | 14.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 16.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 24.1% |
| Operating margin | 12.2% | 12.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 7.5% | 10.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.42% | 7.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 10.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 5.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.69 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.51 | 4.07 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.2× | 5.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.81 | 0.93 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 4.3% |
| Payout ratio | 125% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 15 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 3.1% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.53% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 4.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 48.8% | 25.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 33.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $581K |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
Go deeper
- ENB stock overview
- ENB income statement
- ENB valuation and score
- EPD stock overview
- EPD income statement
- EPD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.