Equity LifeStyle Properties vs Gaming & Leisure Properties
ELS and GLPI side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ELS and GLPI compare
Equity LifeStyle Properties and Gaming & Leisure Properties are about the same size, with market caps of $12.1B and $11.4B.
On earnings, Gaming & Leisure Properties is cheaper: it trades at 12.0× trailing earnings, against 30.9× for Equity LifeStyle Properties.
Gaming & Leisure Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.3% versus 3.2% for Equity LifeStyle Properties).
Gaming & Leisure Properties keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 55.2% compared with 25.6% at Equity LifeStyle Properties.
Both pay dividends: Equity LifeStyle Properties yields 3.5% and Gaming & Leisure Properties 8.1%.
Gaming & Leisure Properties scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 9 for Equity LifeStyle Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ELS | GLPI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.1B | $11.4B |
| Share price | $62.12 | $39.34 |
| Change, 1 year | −0.02% | −12.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −26.7% | −15.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.40 | 0.52 |
| Employees | 3,200 | 20 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 6 | 6 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 30.9× | 12.0× (better) |
| P/S | 7.7× | 6.8× (better) |
| P/B | 6.9× | 2.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 19.3× | 7.0× (better) |
| PEG | 3.25 (better) | 4.02 |
| Fair value | $53.05 | $57.59 |
| Margin of safety | −17.1% | 31.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.2% | 7.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.5% | 6.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1.3% | 20.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2.0% | 17.6% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 10.0% (better) | 5.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 26.1% | 79.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 25.6% | 55.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 23.1% (better) | 19.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 19.0% | 31.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 3.0× | 3.5× (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.34 (better) | 1.02 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.5% | 8.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 102% | 98.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 4.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.5% | 8.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 108% | 95.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.71% | 4.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$202K (better) | −$2.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.5% | 3.7% |
Go deeper
- ELS stock overview
- ELS income statement
- ELS valuation and score
- GLPI stock overview
- GLPI income statement
- GLPI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.