Euronet Worldwide vs East West Bancorp
EEFT and EWBC side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EEFT and EWBC compare
East West Bancorp is the larger company, worth 6.8 times as much as Euronet Worldwide ($17.9B against $2.6B).
On earnings, Euronet Worldwide is cheaper: it trades at 11.5× trailing earnings, against 12.4× for East West Bancorp.
East West Bancorp grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.4% versus 5.0% for Euronet Worldwide).
East West Bancorp keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 46.4% compared with 6.4% at Euronet Worldwide.
East West Bancorp pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Euronet Worldwide does not pay one.
East West Bancorp scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 12 for Euronet Worldwide), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EEFT | EWBC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.6B | $17.9B |
| Share price | $70.49 | $130.68 |
| Change, 1 year | −1.6% | 24.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −35.8% | 61.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.05 | 1.10 |
| Employees | 10K | 3,350 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.5× (better) | 12.4× |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 5.7× |
| P/B | 2.1× | 2.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.1× | – |
| P/FCF | 8.6× | – |
| PEG | 0.73 (better) | 1.96 |
| FCF yield | 11.6% | – |
| Fair value | $104.08 | $110.72 |
| Margin of safety | 32.3% (better) | −18.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.0% | 10.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.3% | 12.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −7.7% | 15.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −10.5% | 16.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 19.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 11.0% | – |
| Net margin | 6.4% | 46.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.0% | – |
| Return on equity | 22.0% (better) | 16.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.5% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.70 | 0.00 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.91 | – |
| Interest coverage | 6.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.42 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 2.12 (better) | 0.32 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 8 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 16.9% |
| Buyback yield | 16.1% (better) | 0.56% |
| Shareholder yield | 16.1% (better) | 3.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 92.3% |
| Held by insiders | 7.6% | 0.76% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $231K (better) | −$30.6M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 16.0% | 3.4% |
Go deeper
- EEFT stock overview
- EEFT income statement
- EEFT valuation and score
- EWBC stock overview
- EWBC income statement
- EWBC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.