Columbia Banking System vs East West Bancorp
COLB and EWBC side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COLB and EWBC compare
East West Bancorp is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Columbia Banking System ($17.9B against $8.7B).
On earnings, Columbia Banking System is cheaper: it trades at 10.6× trailing earnings, against 12.4× for East West Bancorp.
Columbia Banking System grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (33.6% versus 10.4% for East West Bancorp).
East West Bancorp keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 46.4% compared with 30.2% at Columbia Banking System.
Both pay dividends: Columbia Banking System yields 4.8% and East West Bancorp 2.4%.
Columbia Banking System scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 14 for East West Bancorp), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COLB | EWBC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.7B | $17.9B |
| Share price | $30.71 | $130.68 |
| Change, 1 year | 13.3% | 24.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −9.8% | 61.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.90 | 1.10 |
| Employees | 6,005 | 3,350 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 14 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.6× (better) | 12.4× |
| P/S | 3.1× (better) | 5.7× |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 2.0× |
| PEG | – | 1.96 |
| Fair value | $31.52 | $110.72 |
| Margin of safety | 2.6% (better) | −18.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 33.6% (better) | 10.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −21.8% | 12.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 74.7% (better) | 15.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 29.6% (better) | 16.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 12.1% | 19.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 30.2% | 46.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.2% | 16.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.14 | 0.32 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.8% (better) | 2.4% |
| Payout ratio | 50.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 8 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 12.5% | 16.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 8.3% (better) | 0.56% |
| Shareholder yield | 13.1% (better) | 3.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.3% | 92.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.78% | 0.76% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$983K (better) | −$30.6M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.7% | 3.4% |
Go deeper
- COLB stock overview
- COLB income statement
- COLB valuation and score
- EWBC stock overview
- EWBC income statement
- EWBC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.