Ecolab vs PPG Industries
ECL and PPG side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ECL and PPG compare
Ecolab is the larger company, worth 3.1 times as much as PPG Industries ($86.3B against $27.6B).
On earnings, PPG Industries is cheaper: it trades at 17.9× trailing earnings, against 41.9× for Ecolab.
Ecolab grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.3% versus 6.4% for PPG Industries).
Ecolab keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.0% compared with 9.4% at PPG Industries.
Both pay dividends: Ecolab yields 0.95% and PPG Industries 1.7%.
PPG Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 16 for Ecolab), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ECL | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $86.3B | $27.6B |
| Share price | $307.86 | $124.97 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.1% | 30.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 31.1% | −22.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.95 | 1.00 |
| Employees | 48K | 44K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 41.9× | 17.9× (better) |
| P/S | 5.0× | 1.7× (better) |
| P/B | 8.3× | 3.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 34.1× | 11.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 48.1× | 21.6× (better) |
| PEG | 1.74 | 1.04 (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.1% | 4.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $241.95 | $148.48 |
| Margin of safety | −27.2% | 15.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.3% (better) | 6.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.4% (better) | 2.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.9% | 57.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 5.6% | 58.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 9.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 43.9% (better) | 40.9% |
| Operating margin | 16.7% | – |
| Net margin | 12.0% (better) | 9.4% |
| FCF margin | 10.3% (better) | 7.7% |
| Return on equity | 20.7% (better) | 19.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.27 | 0.81 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.30 | 1.79 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 7.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.11 | 1.58 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.02 (better) | 3.56 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.95% | 1.7% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 39.3% | 40.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 7.2% (better) | 5.8% |
| Buyback yield | 1.3% | 1.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.2% | 3.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 80.5% | 94.3% |
| Held by insiders | 10.6% | 0.10% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$17.2M | −$15.5M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.7% | 3.2% |
Go deeper
- ECL stock overview
- ECL income statement
- ECL valuation and score
- PPG stock overview
- PPG income statement
- PPG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.