DNOW vs Dover
DNOW and DOV side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DNOW and DOV compare
Dover is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as DNOW ($27.9B against $2.5B).
DNOW grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (96.8% versus 8.2% for Dover).
Dover keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.6% compared with −3.9% at DNOW.
Dover pays a dividend yielding 0.99%; DNOW does not pay one.
Dover scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 8 for DNOW), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DNOW | DOV |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.5B | $27.9B |
| Share price | $13.90 | $209.95 |
| Change, 1 year | 7.3% | 14.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 49.5% | 19.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.88 | 0.97 |
| Employees | 5,300 | 24K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 24.5× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 3.3× |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 3.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 16.3× |
| P/FCF | 12.4× (better) | 23.5× |
| PEG | – | 10.72 |
| FCF yield | 8.1% (better) | 4.3% |
| Fair value | $15.56 | $170.06 |
| Margin of safety | 10.6% (better) | −23.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 96.8% (better) | 8.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.7% (better) | 3.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −338% | −48.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −47.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 11.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.1% | 39.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | −3.9% | 17.0% (better) |
| Net margin | −3.9% | 13.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 4.2% | 13.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | −11.3% | 15.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −10.1% | 11.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.52 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.22 |
| Interest coverage | – | 12.7× |
| Current ratio | 2.08 (better) | 1.95 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.08 | 5.49 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.99% |
| Payout ratio | – | 24.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 1.00% |
| Buyback yield | 4.1% (better) | 3.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.1% | 4.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 107% | 92.5% |
| Held by insiders | 1.9% | 0.48% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.5M (better) | −$38.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.5% | 3.3% |
Go deeper
- DNOW stock overview
- DNOW income statement
- DNOW valuation and score
- DOV stock overview
- DOV income statement
- DOV valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.