Digital Realty Trust vs Prologis
DLR and PLD side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DLR and PLD compare
Prologis is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Digital Realty Trust ($124B against $68.5B).
On earnings, Prologis is cheaper: it trades at 28.7× trailing earnings, against 75.5× for Digital Realty Trust.
Digital Realty Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.0% versus 7.2% for Prologis).
Prologis keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 45.5% compared with 13.1% at Digital Realty Trust.
Both pay dividends: Digital Realty Trust yields 2.7% and Prologis 3.2%.
Prologis scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 7 for Digital Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DLR | PLD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $68.5B | $124B |
| Share price | $181.13 | $130.03 |
| Change, 1 year | 7.0% | 4.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 9.4% | −13.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.90 | 1.05 |
| Employees | 4,282 | 2,802 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 75.5× | 28.7× (better) |
| P/S | 9.7× (better) | 13.2× |
| P/B | 2.4× | 2.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 30.5× | 15.7× (better) |
| PEG | 1.58 | – |
| Fair value | $88.57 | $113.69 |
| Margin of safety | −104% | −14.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.0% (better) | 7.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.4% | 14.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −33.8% | 32.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −38.3% | 32.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 29.1% (better) | 12.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 2.8% | 54.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 13.1% | 45.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 3.6% | 7.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 0.66% | 9.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 0.4× | 4.8× (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.52 | 1.94 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.7% | 3.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 196% | 93.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 12 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 11.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.7% | 3.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100% | 92.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.03% | 0.24% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$695K (better) | −$8.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.0% | – |
Go deeper
- DLR stock overview
- DLR income statement
- DLR valuation and score
- PLD stock overview
- PLD income statement
- PLD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.